Isom v. Valley Forge Insurance Company et al
***DISREGARD***ORDER. Response to Motion for Reconsideration 120 due on or before January 25, 2017. If Movant wishes to file a rebuttal, he or she may do so on or before February 1, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/11/2017 (dtj) Modified on 1/11/2017 (srd).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
JONATHAN M. ISOM
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-109-KS-MTP
VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
On January 11, 2017, Plaintiff Jonathan M. Isom (“Movant”) filed his Motions for
Reconsideration . Defendants (“Respondents”) have until on or before January 25, 2017, to
respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movant wishes to file a
rebuttal, he may do so on or before February 1, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4).
If either Movant or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for
such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must
advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movant’s original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five (35)
pages, and Respondents’ response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5). If
a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the 11th day of January, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?