Quick v. Hodge et al

Filing 84

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Defendants' Motions 72 and the 74 for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion 56 to Amend is DENIED. The Complaint herein is hereby dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/12/2018. (CS)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EASTERN DIVISION

ROSSTON NICHOLAS QUICK

VERSUS

PLAINTIFF

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-cv-167- KS-MTP

ALEX HODGE, et al

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on January 22, 2018, after referral of hearing by
this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court,
having fully reviewed the same as well as the record in this matter, and being duly advised in the
premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this
Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and the same
hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and that defendants’ Motions [72] and the [74] for
Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion [56] to Amend is DENIED. The
Complaint herein is hereby dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered
herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
SO ORDERED, this the 12th

day of February, 2018.

__s/Keith Starrett ________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE