Gilmore v. State of Mississippi et al
Filing
13
ORDER. Defendants have until on or before May 22, 2017 to respond to Motion to Remand 4 . If Movant wishes to file a rebuttal, she may do so on or before May 30, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/11/2017 (dtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EASTERN DIVISION
KARLENE GILMORE
v.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-63-KS-MTP
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On May 8, 2017, Plaintiff Karlene Gilmore (“Movant”) filed her Motion to Remand [4].
Defendants (“Respondents”) have until on or before May 22, 2017, to respond to this motion. Fed.
R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movant wishes to file a rebuttal, she may do so on or
before May 30, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4).
If either Movant or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for
such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must
advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movant’s original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five
(35) pages, and Respondents’ response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5).
If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the
11th
day of May, 2017.
s/Keith Starrett_________________
KEITH STARRETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?