Gilmore v. State of Mississippi et al
ORDER. Plaintiff has until on or before May 23, 2017 to respond to Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 6 7 8 . If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before May 30, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/11/2017 (dtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-63-KS-MTP
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al.
On May 9, 2017, Defendants (“Movants”) filed their Motions to Dismiss for Lack of
Jurisdiction . Plaintiff (“Respondent”) has until on or before May 23, 2017, to respond
to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a rebuttal,
they may do so on or before May 30, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4).
If either Movants or Respondent require an extension of time, they must file a motion for
such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must
advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movants’ original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five
(35) pages, and Respondent’s response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5).
If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the
day of May, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?