Cooley v. Hodge et al
Filing
10
ORDER. Plaintiff has until on or before August 21, 2017 to respond to Motion to Dismiss 7 . If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before August 28, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 8/7/2017 (dtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
EASTERN DIVISION
ANDRE DESHAWN COOLEY
v.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-71-KS-MTP
ALEX HODGE, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On August 7, 2017, Defendants (“Movants”) filed their Motion to Dismiss [7]. Plaintiff
(“Respondent”) has until on or before August 21, 2017, to respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P.
6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before
August 28, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4).
If either Movants or Respondent require an extension of time, they must file a motion for
such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must
advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movants’ original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five
(35) pages, and Respondent’s response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5).
If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the _7th____ day of August, 2017.
_s/Keith Starrett____________________
KEITH STARRETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?