Cooley v. Hodge et al

Filing 10

ORDER. Plaintiff has until on or before August 21, 2017 to respond to Motion to Dismiss 7 . If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before August 28, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 8/7/2017 (dtj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION ANDRE DESHAWN COOLEY v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-71-KS-MTP ALEX HODGE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On August 7, 2017, Defendants (“Movants”) filed their Motion to Dismiss [7]. Plaintiff (“Respondent”) has until on or before August 21, 2017, to respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before August 28, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If either Movants or Respondent require an extension of time, they must file a motion for such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10). Movants’ original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five (35) pages, and Respondent’s response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5). If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the _7th____ day of August, 2017. _s/Keith Starrett____________________ KEITH STARRETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?