Brooks v. Martin et al
ORDER of DISMISSAL. The parties announced that this case has been fully compromised and settled, and that settlement documents have been executed. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 5/13/09 (TRS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION WILLIE LEE BROOKS VS.
PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05cv191HTW-JCS
EDWARD NEAL MARTIN; GEORGE SANDIFER; AMERICAN NATIONAL BAIL BONDING AGENCY, INC.; INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY; RONNIE PENNINGTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY AND JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20 ORDER
This day came on to be heard the joint motion of Plaintiff, Willie Lee Brooks, and Edward Neal Martin; American National Bail Bonding Agency, Inc.; George Sandifer; and International Fidelity Insurance Company for dismissal of the above styled and numbered cause, and the Court having found that this case has been fully compromised and settled, and that settlement documents have been executed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, this the 13th day of May, 2009.
s/ HENRY T. WINGATE __________________________________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
/s/ David C. Dunbar/by TR David C. Dunbar, Esq. Benny McCalip Mac May, Esq. DUNBARMONROE, PLLC A1855 Lakeland Drive, Suite R-201 Jackson, Mississippi 39216 Attorneys for the Plaintiff /s/ William H. Kirksey by TR William H. Kirksey, Esq. Post Office Box 33 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Attorney for American Bonding & George Sandifer Chuck McRae, Esq. Post Office Box 33 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Attorney for Edward Neal Martin /s/ Thomas E. Royals Thomas E. Royals, Esq. 200 North Congress Street, Suite 401 Post Office Box 22909 Jackson, MS 39225-2909 Attorney for International Fidelity Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?