Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL: it is the opinion of the Court that said motion to dismiss all claims should be granted; the Court being advised that all issues existing between the parties have been resolved; that this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 9/22/08 (SEC)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION TIRFARI SMITH VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-cv-27DPJ-JCS

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, NISSAN COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY PLAN JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

DEFENDANTS

This cause came on for hearing on the joint ore tenus motion to dismiss of the Plaintiff and the Defendants, and the Court being advised that all issues existing between the parties have been resolved, it is the opinion of the Court that said motion to dismiss all claims should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 22th day of September, 2008. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Agreed to and Approved by: /s/ Barry S. Zirulnik Barry S. Zirulnik (MSB #6681) Counsel for Plaintiff /s/ Kenna L. Mansfield, Jr. Kenna L. Mansfield, Jr. (MSB #1855) Counsel for Defendants
CH3-08cv27 Smith v. MetLife, et al. (dismissal).WPD