Shamburger v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

Filing 37

AGREED ORDER DISMISSING CASE: JONETTE SHAMBURGER, through her attorney, for entry of a Judgment of Dismissal to dismiss this cause with prejudice on the basis that all claims have been fully resolved and compromised, the Court, understanding that cou nsel for the Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, joins in with this motion, finds that the relief requested is well founded and should be granted; that the herein styled and numbered cause be, and the same hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 9/29/09 (SEC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION JONETTE SHAMBURGER VS. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP; AND JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-cv-00042-HTW-LRA DEFENDANTS AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE THIS CAUSE having come on for consideration on the ore tenus motion of Plaintiff, JONETTE SHAMBURGER, through her attorney, for entry of a Judgment of Dismissal to dismiss this cause with prejudice on the basis that all claims have been fully resolved and compromised, the Court, understanding that counsel for the Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, joins in with this motion, finds that the relief requested is well founded and should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the herein styled and numbered cause be, and the same hereby is dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 29th day of September, 2009. s/ HENRY T. WINGATE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPROVED AS TO FORM: s/ Thandi Wade Thandi Wade (MSB #10464) Attorney for Plaintiff s/ Thomas M. Louis Thomas M. Louis (MSB #8484) Attorney for Defendant #shamburger order of dismissal.wpd Page 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?