Realty Mortgage Company v. Federal Insurance Company

Filing 17

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Federal Insurance Company, 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Realty Mortgage Company Objections to R&R due by 8/6/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Sumner on July 23, 2009 (DCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION REALTY MORTGAGE COMPANY VS. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Based on plaintiff's representation that the delay in complying with the court's order requiring it to retain counsel was caused by its having to seek the bankruptcy court's approval to employ counsel to represent it in these proceedings and the fact that the record demonstrates that the bankruptcy court has approved counsel and that counsel has now entered an appearance, the undersigned recommends that defendant's motion to dismiss based on plaintiff's failure to obtain counsel within the time prescribed by the court's May 8, 2009 order be denied. The undersigned further recommends that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time in which to employ special counsel be denied as moot. The parties are hereby notified that failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation contained within this report and recommendation within ten (10) days after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court. 28 U.S.C. §636, Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this the 23rd day of July, 2009. /s/ James C. Sumner PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09CV76TSL-JCS DEFENDANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?