Gentry v. Wexford Health Services, et al

Filing 93

ORDER finding as moot 74 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 74 Motion for TRO; finding as moot 74 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting Report and Recommendations 80 . Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on May 27, 2010. (eqh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION JEFFREY SCOTT GENTRY V. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL. ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. Judge Ball recommended denial of Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order. Plaintiff seeks an order compelling prison medical officials to provide appropriate medical treatment and schedule him for surgery.1 As pointed out by Judge Ball, Plaintiff failed to alleges facts indicating that any of the prerequisites for temporary injunctive relief could be met. See Miss. Power & Light Co. v. United Gas. Pipe Co., 760 F.2d 618 (5th Cir. 1985). The undersigned agrees with Judge Ball's conclusion. Moreover, in his objection, Plaintiff essentially concedes that he has not met the requirements to seek temporary injunctive relief. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court, and Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order should be denied. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 27th day of May, 2010. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09CV173 DPJ-FKB DEFENDANTS Plaintiff's single filing was docketed by the clerk's office as a motion for a temporary restraining order, motion to show cause, and motion for preliminary injunction. This order disposes of all three docket entries. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?