Luster v. Beckham et al
ORDER: Plaintiff within 20 days of the date of this order shall provide this Court with the civil action number of every civil action or appeal which the Plaintiff has had dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious or fails to state a c laim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff shall also provide the name of the Court and name(s) of Defendant(s)in each civil action identified. Clerk is directed to issue summons to defendant James Beckham, with the U. S. Marshal to serve same, and the defendant is required to file a response to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 7/20/09 (PKM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION TONY O'NEIL LUSTER, #116811 VERSUS PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv214-HTW-LRA
JAMES BECKHAM and WALNUT GROVE YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ORDER
Plaintiff, an inmate currently incarcerated in the Mississippi State Penitentiary, Parchman, Mississippi, filed this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Defendants are James Beckham and Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility. Upon review of the Court record, it is hereby, ORDERED that the Plaintiff within 20 days of the date of this order shall provide this Court with the civil action number of every civil action or appeal which the Plaintiff has had dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff shall also provide the name of the Court and name(s) of Defendant(s) in each civil action identified. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States District Clerk is hereby directed to issue summons to the Defendant: JAMES BECKHAM, Correctional Officer Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility 1650 Highway 492 P.O. Box 389 Walnut Grove, MS 39189 This Defendant is required to file a response to the complaint. The Clerk is directed to attach a copy of this order to each complaint that will be served on the named Defendant. The United States Marshal shall serve the same pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
The Plaintiff is advised that a summons will not be ordered to be issued for Defendant Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility. This Court finds that this is a private correctional facility and the Plaintiff failed to provide the name and street address of its registered agent wher e summons may be served on this Defendant. If the Plaintiff wishes summons to issue for Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility, he is required to file a motion providing this Court with the name and street address of the registered agent and request that this Court issue summons for defendant Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility. After review of the Plaintiff's complaint and motion, this Court will then decide if summons should issue for defendant Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant files his answer or other responsive pleading in this cause in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that subpoenas shall not be issued except by order of the Court. The United States District Clerk shall not issue subpoenas upon request of the pro se litigant, but shall instead forward the request to the Magistrate Judge assigned to this cause for review. The Plaintiff shall submit all request for the issuance of subpoenas to this office for review. The Plaintiff should understand that this order allowing process to issue against the above named Defendant does not reflect any opinion of this Court that the claims contained in the complaint will or will not be determined to be meritorious. It is the Plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Failure to advise this Court of a change of address or failure to comply with any order of this Court will be deemed as a 2
purposeful delay and contumacious act by the Plaintiff and may result in the dismissal of this case. THIS the 20th day of July, 2009.
s / Linda R. Anderson
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?