Moore et al v. Franklin County, Mississippi

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss Those Portions of the Complaint Asserting State Law Claims. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 1/20/09 (dtj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION THOMAS MOORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES AND HEIRS AT LAW OF CHARLES MOORE, DECEASED THELMA COLLINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES AND HEIRS AT LAW OF HENRY DEE, DECEASED V. FRANKLIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI AGREED ORDER DISMISSING THOSE PORTIONS OF THE COMPLAINT ASSERTING STATE LAW CLAIMS THIS COURT, having considered the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Those Portions of the Complaint Asserting State Law Claims, and as Plaintiffs consent to this motion: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the causes of action identified within the Complaint which assert state law theories of liability are dismissed. That nothing in this order shall affect the remaining federal claims, which this court shall consider through pleadings filed in the instant action. So Ordered this the 20th day of January, 2009. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08CV258-DCB-JMR DEFENDANT s/ David Bramlette ________ Honorable David Bramlette United States District Court Judge SO AGREED: For Defendant _/s/ Michael J. Wolf MICHAEL J. WOLF (MSB# 99406) PAGE, KRUGER & HOLLAND, P.A. For Plaintiff /s/ Warren L. Martin, Jr., Esq. WARREN L. MARTIN, Jr. (MSB#101528) Sweet & Associates, P.A. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?