Hester v. Wexford Health Services et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 23 Report and Recommendations re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies as set out in the order. A judgment will be entered in a separate docket entry to follow. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on November 2, 2010. (SP)

Download PDF
Hester v. Wexford Health Services et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION JOHN ELBERT HESTER VS. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL. ORDER This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball recommended dismissal of Hester's civil action based on Hester's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e). The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.1 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court, and the same entire action should be dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this the 2nd day of November, 2010. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10CV72 DPJ-FKB DEFENDANTS Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has now passed. The Court also notes that Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?