Fox v. United States of America et al

Filing 94

ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss, and defendants Lampton, Baltz, Watson, Kirchner, Young, Ungesser, Hathorn, Thornton, Calhoun, Rose, Sing(h), May, Finch, Lee, Fillingim, Ramsey, Fedor, and Pollard are dismissed without prejudice; denying withou t prejudice 43 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying as moot 45 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 77 Motion for Extension Time to Serve Summons and Complaint; denying 79 Second Motion for Extension Time to Serve Summon s and Complaint; denying 80 Third Motion for Extension Time to Serve Summons and Complaint; adopting 90 Report and Recommendations re 77 MOTION for Extension Time to Serve Summons and Complaint, 43 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Subject Matter) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Subject Matter), 45 MOTION for More Definite Statement, 42 MOTION to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process, 79 MOTION for Extension Time to Serve Summons and Complaint, 80 MOTI ON for Extension Time to Serve Summons and Complaint. Defendants Madison County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Toby Trowbridge, and the State of Mississippi are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on February 17, 2011. (SP)