Wells v. King et al
ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 7 Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is adopted as the finding of this Court. Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 25, 2012. (SP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:11-cv-392-DPJ-FKB
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge , after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge F.
Keith Ball recommended denial of Respondent’s motion to dismiss. The Court, having fully
reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this
cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation
should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.1
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball  be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this
Court. Respondent’s motion to dismiss  is denied.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 25th day of January, 2012.
s/ Daniel P. Jordan III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Petitioner filed an Objection , asking the Court to “look past the procedural bars and
. . . [g]rant Petitioner the requested relief.” Objection  at 5. As stated, Judge Ball
recommended denying Respondent’s motion to dismiss and allowing the habeas petition to
proceed. No determination of the merits of the petition has been made at this time. In short, the
Court reviewed the Objection and remains of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation
should be adopted.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?