McCune v. United States Department of Justice et al

Filing 163

AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL dismissing, with prejudice, all claims against Defendant Regions Financial Corporation f/k/a Union Planters Bank, with each party to bear their own costs. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on March 27, 2013. (lda)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION FRANK B. McCUNE, JR. PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv423-DCB-JMR UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; MERCHANT AND FARMERS BANK; REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, F/K/A UNION PLANTERS BANK; MEMBERS EXCHANGE CREDIT UNION, F/K/A INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION; AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., F/K/A AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICES; and VARIOUS “JOHN DOES” DEFENDANTS AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the agreement of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, Regions Financial Corporation f/k/a Union Planters Bank (hereafter “Regions”), and the Court being advised that the plaintiff is desirous of dismissing all claims against Regions with prejudice, is of the opinion that the following relief should be granted: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. That this action as against Regions is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs; 2. That this action as against all other defendants shall proceed and shall not be affected by the entry of this judgment; and 3. This Judgment is a final judgment pursuant to the provisions of Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 27655311-1 Page 1 of 2 SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 27th day of March, 2013. s/David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AGREED: /s/ Robert L. Gibbs ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF /s/ William C. Brabec ATTORNEY FOR REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATIN F/K/A UNION PLANTERS BANK 27655311-1 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?