McCune v. United States Department of Justice et al

Filing 353

AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL dismissing, with prejudice, all claims against Defendant Merchant & Farmers Bank, with each party to bear their own costs. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on September 10, 2013. (lda)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION FRANK B. MCCUNE, JR. VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:11-cv-00423 DCB MTP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; MERCHANT AND FARMERS BANK; REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, F/K/A UNION PLANTERS BANK; MEMBERS EXCHANGE CREDIT UNION, F/K/A INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION; AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., F/K/A AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICES; VARIOUS “JOHN DOES” DEFENDANTS AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL This cause having come before the Court on the agreement of Plaintiff and Defendant, Merchant & Farmers Bank (M&F), and having been advised that Plaintiff is desirous of dismissing all claims against M&F with prejudice, the Court is of the opinion that the following relief should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. That this action as against Merchant & Farmers Bank is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs; 2. That this action as against all other remaining Defendants shall proceed and shall not be affected by the entry of this Judgment; and 3. 54(b). PD.10405312.1 This Judgment is a Final Judgment pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 10th SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the ____ day of September, 2013. s/David Bramlette ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AGREED: /s/Robert L. Gibbs_____________ ROBERT L. GIBBS – MSB #4816 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF /s/Frank W. Trapp_____________ FRANK W. TRAPP – MSB #8261 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, MERCHANT & FARMERS BANK 2 PD.10405312.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?