Welch v. Lewis et al
ORDER adopting 38 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court, and the entire action should be dismissed without prejudice. A judgment will be docketed in a separate entry to follow. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on July 8, 2013. (SP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NICCOLA M. WELCH
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv144-DPJ-FKB
TYRONE LEWIS, et al.
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation  of
the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball
recommended granting Defendants Sheriff Tyrone Lewis, Major Mary Rushing, and Captain
Mike Ivy’s motion for summary judgment.1 Judge Ball recommended dismissing Welch’s claims
without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Welch did not file an
Objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has now passed. The Court,
having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said
Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court,
and the same entire action should be dismissed without prejudice.
Plaintiff has not effected service on Defendants Malcolm McMillin and Captain Ogden
A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by
Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 8th day of July, 2013.
s/ Daniel P. Jordan III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?