Knight v. Perry et al

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, granting 34 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, denying as moot 33 Motion to Amend/Correct scheduling order, denying as moot 32 motion to dismiss for failure to serve process. A separate judgment will be entered dismising case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 4/1/14 (copy mailed to Curtis D. Knight, #98592, CMCF (720), 3B-2, C-Zone, Bed #188, P. O. Box 88550, Pearl, MS 39288) (LWE)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CURTIS D. KNIGHT, 398502 VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13CV258TSL-JMR GLORIA PERRY, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER This cause is before the court on the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge John M. Roper entered on March 3, 2014, recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust be granted and that the motions to dismiss for failure to serve process and to amend the scheduling order be denied as moot. Plaintiff Curtis D. Knight has not filed objections and the time for doing so has since expired. Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the court concludes that the motions are well taken and hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate John M. Roper entered on March 3, 2014, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust is granted and that defendants’ remaining motions are denied as moot. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2014. /s/ Tom S. Lee UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?