Birdsong v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER granting 11 Motion to Affirm; adopting 13 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. The case is dismissed with prejudice. A judgment will be entered in a separate docket entry to follow. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on August 11, 2014. (SP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION JIMMY ONEAL BIRDSONG, JR. PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13cv389-DPJ-FKB CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball recommended that the decision of the Commissioner, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, be affirmed. The deadline to object under Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has now passed without objection. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court. The Commissioner’s Motion to Affirm [11] is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 11th day of August, 2014. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?