Blunt v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Filing 71

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 66 Report and Recommendations. Dismissing with Prejudice. Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 5/31/18 (MGB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CHARLIE BLUNT PETITIONER VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13CV575TSL-JCG HUBERT DAVIS, WARDEN; AND RON KING, SUPERINTENDENT RESPONDENTS ORDER This cause is before the objections of petitioner Charlie Blunt to the report and recommendation entered by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on April 24, 2018, recommending that Blunt’s § 2254 petition be dismissed with prejudice. Having reviewed the objections, the court concludes that they should be overruled and that the report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of the court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo entered on April 24, 2018, be, and the same is hereby adopted as the finding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, the court concludes that a certificate of appealability shall not issue. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000). A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 31st of May, 2018. /s/Tom S. Lee UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?