Cabrera-Ruiz v. Longley

Filing 18

ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. Cabrera-Ruiz's claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. A judgment will be docketed in a separate docket entry to follow. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on October 8, 2014. (SP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CARLOS A. CABRERA-RUIZ PETITIONER v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13cv828-DPJ-FKB ARCHIE B. LONGLEY RESPONDENT ORDER This petition is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [15] of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending dismissal for failure to exhaust. Petitioner Carols A. Cabrera-Ruiz filed a timely objection [16]. Magistrate Judge Ball concluded that Cabrera-Ruiz failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by failing to perfect an administrative appeal to the Bureau of Prisons’ general counsel, the final level of review in the BOP’s Administrative Remedy Program under 28 C.F.R. § 542.10 et seq. In his objection, Cabrera-Ruiz does not directly address the point, but conclusorily asserts that he “has been filed all his remedy process in order that he can have the appropriate access to the court under 28 U.S.C. 2241 Motion to the best of his knowledge.” Obj. [16]. The Court agrees that Cabrera-Ruiz has not demonstrated that he exhausted prior to filing suit. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court. Cabrera-Ruiz’s claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 8th day of October, 2014. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?