Burgess v. Reddix et al

Filing 72

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 47 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Carl Faulks, Michael Reddix, O. Little, Carl Reddix; 45 Motion to Dismiss filed by J. Birdtail; 55 Report and Recommendations; and 32 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Christopher Epps, David Petrie. 71 Motion for Reconsideration, filed by Mark Burgess, is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 03/14/14. (jc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION MARK BURGESS VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13cv1006-CWR-FKB DR. MICHAEL REDDIX, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball entered on September 12, 2013 dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint after considering Plaintiff's allegations and receiving Plaintiff’s testimony at an omnibus hearing. Having considered said Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff’s objections thereto, applicable statutory and case law, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s objection is without merit and hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball entered on September 12, 2013 is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. The Complaint in this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice. Any other outstanding motions in this case are denied as moot. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED, this the 14th day of March, 2014. s/Carlton W. Reeves UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?