Sparks v. Colvin
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; 7 Motion for Summary Judgment denied; 11 Motion to Affirm granted. This action will be dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 8/11/15 (LWE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANGELA DIANNE SPARKS
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14CV120TSL-JCG
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
DEFENDANT
ORDER
This cause is before the court on the objections of plaintiff
Angela Dianne Sparks to the report and recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on June 12, 2015,
recommending that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be
denied and the government’s motion to affirm the decision of the
Commissioner be granted.
The court, having fully reviewed the
report and recommendation and being duly advised in the premise,
and having conducted a de novo review of those portions of the
report and recommendation to which objections were made, now finds
that the report and recommendation should be adopted as the
opinion on the court over plaintiff’s objections.
Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that plaintiff’s
objections to the report and recommendation are overruled.
It is
further ordered that the report and recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo be, and the same is
hereby, adopted as the findings of the court.
It follows then
that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and that
defendant’s motion to affirm is granted, such that the action will
be dismissed with prejudice.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule
58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2015.
/s/Tom S. Lee
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?