Jackson v. The State of Mississippi et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice. Further, a Certificate of Appealability should not issue for the reasons set forth herein. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 1/14/16 (LWE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID JACKSON
PETITIONER
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14CV198TSL-JCG
THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the report and
recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo,
and the court, having fully reviewed the report and
recommendation entered in this cause on December 16, 2015, and
being duly advised in the premises, finds that said report and
recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the report and recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo entered on
December 16, 2015, be, and the same is hereby adopted as the
finding of this court, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus
is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability
should not issue.
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that
“jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition
states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and
that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this]
court was correct in its procedural ruling."
Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000).
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule
58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED this 14th day of January, 2016.
/s/Tom S. Leee
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?