Versell v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: granting 19 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mississippi Department of Corrections, Timothy Outlaw. Certificate of Appealability Denied/Should not issue. The 1 writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered as set out herein. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 7/28/15 (copy mailed to plaintiff at #51464, 2014 Pleasant Avenue, Jackson, MS 39213) (LWE)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION BENJAMIN VERSELL PETITIONER VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14CV300TSL-JCG WARDEN TIMOTHY OUTLAW RESPONDENT ORDER This cause came on this date to be heard upon the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo, and the court, having fully reviewed the report and recommendation entered in this cause on June 17, 2015, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo entered on June 17, 2015, be, and the same is hereby adopted as the finding of this court, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability should not issue. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000). A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2015. /s/ Tom S. Lee UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?