Stewart v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER Denying 18 Motion for Attorney's Fees. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 8/4/2016. (AN)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION

AMELIA STEWART
O/B/F T.D.F.

PLAINTIFF

V.

CAUSE NO. 3:14-CV-349-CWR-LRA

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security

DEFENDANT

ORDER
Before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the Equal
Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Docket No. 19. The defendant objected.
Docket No. 20.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B),
A party seeking an award of fees and other expenses shall, within thirty days of
final judgment in the action, submit to the court an application for fees and other
expenses which shows that the party is a prevailing party and is eligible to receive
an award under this subsection.
Because § 2412 operates as a waiver of the federal government’s immunity from suits for
attorney’s fees, the Fifth Circuit has held that its 30-day filing deadline “is to be strictly
construed.” Clifton v. Heckler, 755 F.2d 1138, 1144 (5th Cir. 1985). Compliance with the
statutory time limitation is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an award of fees. Id. at 1145.
The EAJA 30-day time limitation begins to run after entry of the final judgment and at
the expiration of the 60-day appeal period. Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 554 (5th Cir. 1993)
(citation and quotation marks omitted). Thus, a plaintiff must file an application for attorney’s
fees within 90 days after entry of a final judgment. Carter v. Bowen, 733 F. Supp. 1084, 1086
1

(S.D. Miss. 1990) (citing Russell v. Nat’l Mediation Board, 764 F.2d 341, 349 (5th Cir. 1985),
vacated on other grounds and remanded, 775 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1985)). The 90-day time
limitation “is derived from the addition of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 4(a)
period of 60 days plus the EAJA period of 30 days.” Id. A remand pursuant to the fourth
sentence of § 405(g), as in this case, “constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period
for a § 2412 fee application.” Freeman, 2 F.3d at 553 (5th Cir. 1993) (citation and quotation
marks omitted).
In this case, Final Judgment was rendered on September 25, 2015. Therefore, the
plaintiff had until December 28, 2015 to file her application for attorney’s fees. The plaintiff,
however, filed her application on April 19, 2015, almost four months after the limitation period
expired. For this reason, the plaintiff’s application must be denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 4th day of August, 2016.
s/ Carlton W. Reeves
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2