Ingram v. Colvin
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS over plaintiff's objections; denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Bobby Ingram, granting 13 Motion to Affirm. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 9/22/15 (LWE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
BOBBY INGRAM
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14CV390TSL-JCG
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
DEFENDANT
ORDER
This cause is before the court on the objections of plaintiff
Bobby Ingram to the report and recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on August 3, 2015, recommending
that the government’s motion to affirm the decision of the
commissioner be granted and that plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment be denied.
The court, having fully reviewed the report
and recommendation and being duly advised in the premises, and
having conducted a de novo review of those portions of the report
and recommendation to which objections were made, now finds that
the report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of
the court over plaintiff’s objections.
Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that plaintiff’s
objections to the report and recommendation are overruled.
It is
further ordered that the report and recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo be, and the same is
hereby, adopted as the findings of the court.
It follows then
that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and that
the government’s motion to affirm is granted, such that the action
will be dismissed with prejudice.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule
58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2015.
/s/ Tom S. Lee
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?