U-Save Auto Rental of America, Inc. v. Merit Associates, Inc. et al

Filing 69

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 63 Report and Recommendations. The court grants the defendants' 53 motion to enforce the settlement agreement; agrees with the United States Magistrate Judge that attorneys' fees are not w arranted, and that plaintiff's ]60] motion to strike the defendants' request for attorney's fees is moot. The parties are directed to comply with the settlement agreement in the manner described in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 7/13/16 (TRS)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION U-SAVE AUTO RENTAL OF AMERICA vs. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-792 HTW-LRA MERIT ASSOCIATES, INC. and WILLIAM C. BURCH, III DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter comes on pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper [docket no. 63] and the plaintiff’s and the defendants’ written objections [docket nos. 65 and 66] to the proposed findings and recommendation. Based upon the evidence therein contained, this court, having given full consideration to the aforesaid objections, finds the same not well taken. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [docket no. 63] is hereby adopted as the order of this court. This court grants the defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement [docket no. 53]. Further, this court agrees with the United States Magistrate Judge that attorneys’ fees are not warranted, and that the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendants’ request for attorneys’ fees [docket no. 60] is moot. The parties are directed to comply with the settlement agreement in the manner described in the Report and Recommendation. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 13th day of July, 2016. s/ HENRY T. WINGATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?