U-Save Auto Rental of America, Inc. v. Merit Associates, Inc. et al
Filing
69
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 63 Report and Recommendations. The court grants the defendants' 53 motion to enforce the settlement agreement; agrees with the United States Magistrate Judge that attorneys' fees are not w arranted, and that plaintiff's ]60] motion to strike the defendants' request for attorney's fees is moot. The parties are directed to comply with the settlement agreement in the manner described in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 7/13/16 (TRS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
U-SAVE AUTO RENTAL OF AMERICA
vs.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-792 HTW-LRA
MERIT ASSOCIATES, INC. and
WILLIAM C. BURCH, III
DEFENDANTS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter comes on pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper [docket no. 63] and the plaintiff’s and the
defendants’ written objections [docket nos. 65 and 66] to the proposed findings and
recommendation. Based upon the evidence therein contained, this court, having given
full consideration to the aforesaid objections, finds the same not well taken. Therefore,
the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [docket no. 63]
is hereby adopted as the order of this court. This court grants the defendants’ motion to
enforce the settlement agreement [docket no. 53]. Further, this court agrees with the
United States Magistrate Judge that attorneys’ fees are not warranted, and that the
plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendants’ request for attorneys’ fees [docket no. 60] is
moot. The parties are directed to comply with the settlement agreement in the manner
described in the Report and Recommendation.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 13th day of July, 2016.
s/ HENRY T. WINGATE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?