Lewis v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Affirm; adopting 13 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. The decision of the Social Security Administration is affirmed, and this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. A judgment will be entered in a separate docket entry to follow. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 7, 2016. (SP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
BOBBY MICHAEL LEWIS
PLAINTIFF
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-cv-812-DPJ-FKB
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
DEFENDANT
ORDER
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball
recommended affirming the decision of the Social Security Administration. Plaintiff Bobby
Michael Lewis did not file an Objection, and the time to do so has passed. The Court, having
fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and
Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court.
The decision of the Social Security Administration is affirmed, and this appeal is dismissed with
prejudice.
A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by
Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 7th day of March, 2016.
s/ Daniel P. Jordan III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?