Frazier v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Deborah Frazier; granting 13 Motion to Affirm filed by Carolyn W. Colvin. This case will be dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 8/2/16 (LWE)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION DEBORAH FRAZIER VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15CV39TSL-RHW CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER This cause is before the court on the objections of plaintiff Deborah Frazier to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on July 12, 2016, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and the government’s motion to affirm the decision of the commissioner be granted. The court, having fully reviewed the report and recommendation and being duly advised in the premises, and having conducted a de novo review of those portions of the report and recommendation to which objections were made, now finds that the objections should be overruled and that the report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of the court. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation are overruled. It is further ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the findings of the court. It follows then that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and that the government’s motion to affirm is granted, such that the action will be dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2016. /s/Tom S. Lee UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?