Gordon v. Fisher et al
Filing
55
ORDER granting 48 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status; adopting 54 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. Gordon's in forma pauperis status is revoked, and he has thirty (30) days from entry of this Order to pay the filing fee. Failure to pay the fee will result in dismissal for want of prosecution without further notice. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on November 8, 2016.(SP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
PLAINTIFF
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15CV592 DPJ-FKB
MARSHALL FISHER, COMMISSIONER, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation [54] of
the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball
recommended revoking Gordon’s in forma pauperis status because he has on three prior
occasions had an action or appeal dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a
claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly
advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the
opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [54] of United
States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this
Court. Defendants’ motion to revoke ifp status [48] is granted .
Gordon’s in forma pauperis status is revoked, and he has thirty (30) days from entry of
this Order to pay the filing fee. Failure to pay the fee will result in dismissal for want of
prosecution without further notice.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 8th day of November, 2016.
s/ Daniel P. Jordan III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?