Howard v. Blackmon et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 11/7/16. (RRL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION SIMUEL D. HOWARD v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15cv663-DPJ-FKB WARDEN B. E. BLACKMON DEFENDANT ORDER This pro se prisoner case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [18] of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. In general, a Disciplinary Hearing Officer at the Federal Correction Complex in Yazoo City, Mississippi, found that Plaintiff Simuel D. Howard violated prison rules by possessing a cell phone. Howard filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, claiming that the evidence did not support the Disciplinary Officer’s holding or the resulting loss of 41 days of Howard’s good-time credit. On October 17, 2016, Judge Ball issued his Report and Recommendation, concluding that the petition should be dismissed with prejudice. See R&R [18] at 4. Howard filed a timely objection on October 28, 2016, in which he again argued that the evidence did not support the prison’s action against him. See Objection [19]. There is no dispute that Judge Ball applied the correct legal standard. See R&R [18] at 3 (citing Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985) (requiring affirmance of prison decision to revoke good-time credit if supported by “some evidence”)). And for the reasons Judge Ball stated in his Report and Recommendation, this Court agrees that the disciplinary finding was supported by “some evidence.” See Hill, 472 U.S. at 455. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [18] is hereby adopted as the order of the Court. Howard’s claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and his Motion for Summary Judgment [16] is denied. A separate judgment will be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 7th day of November, 2016. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?