Johnson v. MDOC/CMCF et al
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/14/18 (RBM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
KEISHA LASHAY JOHNSON
PLAINTIFF
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-cv-844-FKB
MDOC COMMISSIONER MARSHALL FISHER,
ET. AL
DEFENDANTS
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Keisha Lashay Johnson, formerly in the custody of the Mississippi Department of
Corrections (“MDOC”), alleges that Defendants, all MDOC employees or officials, denied her
access to adequate medical care while she was incarcerated. Before the Court is Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment [49]. Defendants attach no affidavits, exhibits, or medical records
as part of their motion. Johnson has filed no response.
Johnson filed suit on November 20, 2015. [1]. The Court held an omnibus hearing on
February 22, 2017. [44]. While Johnson makes some claims in her written complaint and filings,
most of her claims, and most of the specificity as to those claims, come from her omnibus hearing
testimony. Defendants have failed to submit a transcript of the omnibus hearing as an exhibit to
their motion for summary judgment.
Factional Allegations
During her incarceration, Johnson suffered from a number of serious medical conditions.
She had emergency surgery to treat ruptured intestines and a peptic ulcer in November 2011. She
had a hysterectomy in April 2012 as a result of doctors discovering a fibroid tumor “the size of a
phone book” in her abdomen. Doctors diagnosed her with leukemia in October 2012. As of the
February omnibus hearing, she still suffered from leukemia and peptic ulcer disease.
1
Johnson contends that each of the defendants acted with deliberate indifference in denying
her access to proper medical care. The specifics of her claims are set forth below.
Defendant Dr. Gloria Perry was Johnson’s treating physician in August and December
2011. She later became MDOC’s chief medical officer. Johnson testified that Dr. Perry denied an
MDOC physician’s request that she be allowed to see an outside GI specialist. She testified that
she wrote to Dr. Perry requesting to see the GI specialist, but was again denied. She testified that
her mother wrote to Dr. Perry requesting that Johnson be allowed to see a GI specialist, but she
too was denied. Johnson contends that she was denied access to the GI specialist for the two years
prior to filing her November 2015 complaint. [1] at 3. Johnson testified that Dr. Perry also
interfered in her leukemia treatment. Johnson contends that Dr. Perry denied her the medications
she was prescribed by her oncologist, claiming that Dr. Perry only gave her half of the quantity of
medication prescribed, and replaced that which she did give Johnson with less expensive
substitutes.
Defendant Alma Harris1 was a warden at the Washington County Regional Correctional
Facility (“WCRCF”) while Johnson was incarcerated there. Beginning in September 2011,
Johnson began complaining to Warden Harris that she was not receiving proper medical treatment.
Johnson informed Warden Harris that she was experiencing severe stomach pain, had not been
able to eat for more than three weeks, was vomiting, and had blood in her stool. Johnson testified
that both she and a nurse told Warden Harris about Johnson’s symptoms. Johnson testified that
prison officials responded by giving her acid reflux pills. Johnson testified that she again requested
Warden Harris permit her medical treatment in November 2011, but Harris refused. She testified
that she only received medical treatment after she fell unconscious and was rushed to a hospital
1
Harris has not been served and is not one of the parties moving for summary judgment. Johnson’s allegations
against her are included here to give context to the remainder of her allegations.
2
emergency room. It was discovered that her intestines had ruptured and that she was suffering from
a peptic ulcer.
Defendant Maud Irby was a warden at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility (“CMCF”)
during Johnson’s incarceration there. Johnson contends that Warden Irby denied her access to
medical care in August 2011 related to the stomach pain that eventually culminated in the
November 2011 hospitalization. In 2013 and 2014, Johnson began writing to Warden Irby
complaining that she was receiving insufficient treatment for her leukemia. Johnson testified that
she informed Warden Irby that she had blood in her urine, but that she was not getting proper
treatment. Johnson states that prison doctors gave her an injection, telling her it was an antibiotic,
but that it did not fix the problem. Johnson continued to have blood in her urine and continued to
request medical treatment. This occurred during the same time that Johnson had been
recommended to see a GI specialist, but had not been permitted to do so.
Defendant Wendell Banks was a warden at CMCF during Johnson’s incarceration at that
facility. Johnson contends that Warden Banks denied her access to medical care in September 2015
and February 2016. [10] at 3. Johnson testified that she informed Warden Banks that prison doctors
were not allowing her to see a GI-specialist to treat her for complications stemming from her
leukemia. She testified that she complained to Warden Banks for the entirety of 2016, but was still
unable to see the GI specialist.
Defendant Ronald King was the superintendent of CMCF during Johnson’s incarceration
at that facility. Johnson writes that Defendant King, “after being notified verbally on several
occasions and in writing of medical issues of plaintiff and the request for medical care . . . made
no reasonable effort to see that care was given.” [10] at 3. Plaintiff writes that he denied her access
3
to medical care in September 2014, December 2014, March 2015, June 2015, July 2015, and
August 2015. Id.
Defendant Marshall Fisher was MDOC’s commissioner during Johnson’s incarceration.
Johnson wrote to Commissioner Fisher in August 2015, informing him that she was not receiving
proper treatment for her leukemia and its resulting complications. [10] at 3. She testified that she
wrote to Commissioner Fisher after Dr. Perry refused to let her see a GI specialist, and that he did
nothing to provide her access to the medical care she required.
Analysis
“Prison officials violate the constitutional proscription against cruel and unusual
punishment when they are deliberately indifferent to a prisoner's serious medical needs, as doing
so constitutes unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.” Davidson v. Texas Dep't of Criminal
Justice, 91 Fed. App'x. 963, 964 (5th Cir.2004) (citing Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 297 (1991)).
“A prison official acts with deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment ‘only if he knows
that [an] inmate[ ] face[s] a substantial risk of serious harm and [he] disregards that risk by failing
to take reasonable measures to abate it.’” Medellin v. Shaw, 66 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 1995)(alterations
in original)(quoting Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994)).
Johnson contends that she made each of the defendants personally aware of her medical
needs, and that each of them disregarded the risk to Johnson by failing to take reasonable measures
to abate it. Johnson has stated a prima facie case that each defendant acted with deliberate
indifference to her need for medical care.
Defendants have submitted no summary judgment evidence of any kind in support of their
motion. Defendants have not addressed any of her allegations, nor provided any medical records,
affidavits, or deposition testimony to call into question any of her factual assertions. Defendants,
4
mostly prison administrators, contend that “they are entitled to rely on the decision-making of
trained medical personnel and cannot be deliberately indifferent because of alleged medical
malpractice by medical staff.” [50] at 8. Defendants contend that their actions were “objectively
reasonable,” and that at most their actions were based on a mistaken reliance on the judgment of
medical professionals. Id. at 9-10. However, in her claims recited above against the jail
administrators, Johnson asserts that they denied her access to medical care, not that the medical
care she received was deficient. Further, Defendants submit no evidence of any kind which would
establish that they relied on any medical personnel’s decision making. And as to Defendant Dr.
Perry, this defense does not apply, since Dr. Perry was part of the “medical staff” providing care
to Johnson. Defendants simply have not met their burden to prove that they are entitled to summary
judgment on Johnson’s claims against them in their individual capacities.
Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment with regard
to Johnson’s individual capacity claims should be denied without prejudice. The Court will set a
new dispositive motion deadline. The parties may submit another motion for summary judgment.
However, should Defendants file another motion for summary judgment, their motion must be
properly supported by evidence permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c), including, but not limited to, a
copy of the omnibus hearing transcript. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment must also
address Johnson’s factual allegations as contained within her complaint, written filings, and
omnibus testimony.
With regard to Johnson’s claims against Defendants in their official capacities, Defendants
are employees of the State of Mississippi. The Eleventh Amendment bars suit in federal court
against a state or its employees in their official capacities unless the state has unequivocally waived
its immunity. Pace v. Bogalusa City School Board, 325 F.3d 609, 613 (5th Cir. 2003). State
5
officials sued in their official capacities are not liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Hafer
v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 27-28 (1991). Accordingly, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of
Defendants to the extent they are sued in their official capacities.
The Court will set new dispositive deadlines, as well as a new trial date, in an order to
follow.
SO ORDERED, this the 14th day of March, 2018.
__/s/ F. Keith Ball
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?