Kennedy v. State of Mississippi

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 15 Report and Recommendations, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed with prejudice, granting 11 Motion to Dismiss, denying 12 Motion for Miscellaneous, and Relief filed by Soloman S. Kennedy, filed by State of Mississippi, Marshall Fisher. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability should not issue. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 6/13/2016 (cwl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION SOLOMAN S. KENNEDY PETITIONER VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15CV861TSL-RHW MARSHALL FISHER RESPONDENT ORDER This cause came on this date to be heard upon the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, and the court, having fully reviewed the report and recommendation entered in this cause on May 16, 2016, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker entered on May 16, 2016, be, and the same is hereby adopted as the finding of this court, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability should not issue. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000). A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 13th day of June, 2016. /s/ Tom S. Lee UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?