Moore v. Americorps National Civilian Community Corps et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 10/27/2017. (cr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NATASHA JOHNSON MOORE
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-cv-91 CWR-FKB
KIM MANSARAY1, AS ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
AGREED ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
THIS DAY this cause came on to be heard upon the joint, ore tenus motion of the parties
seeking entry of an Agreed Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice in the above styled and
numbered cause of action. Finding the motion is well taken, the Court grants the motion.
Accordingly, this Court hereby ORDERS that this case is dismissed with prejudice as to
all parties. The settlement disposes of any claims for fees and costs, and no order on that matter
is necessary. This Court retains jurisdiction over the parties and any claims relating to the
enforcement of the settlement agreement should there be any dispute relating to it or the parties’
compliance with it.
SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of October, 2017.
s/ Carlton W. Reeves _________________
United States District Judge
Wendy Spencer is no longer the Chief Executive Officer of Corporation for National and Civil
Community Service. Kim Mansaray is now the Acting Chief Executive Officer of Corporation for
National and Community Service. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), when a public officer
who is a party to a lawsuit in an official capacity resigns or ceases to hold office while the lawsuit is
pending, the officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party.
/s/ Kristi H. Johnson
KRISTI H. JOHNSON
(MS Bar No. 102891)
Attorney for the Defendant
/s/ Victoria Prince Ryals
VICTORIA PRINCE RYALS
(MS Bar No. 103090)
Attorney for the Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?