Flowers v. Tucker et al

Filing 57

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in re 55 Report and Recommendations - It is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Robert H. Walker entered on March 3, 2017, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the fi nding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the complaint in this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 4/3/2017 (ND)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTINA LASHAUN FLOWERS, #08652-043 VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16CV390TSL-RHW SHERIFF RANDY TUCKER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER This cause is before the court on the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker entered on March 3, 2017, recommending that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff Christina LaShaun Flowers has not filed objections and the time for doing so has since expired. Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the court concludes that report and recommendation is well taken and hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Robert H. Walker entered on March 3, 2017, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the complaint in this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 3rd day of April, 2017. /s/ Tom S. Lee UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?