Watson v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
ORDER denying 64 Motion Request for Determination of Privilege, 65 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/11/18 (RBM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-cv-987-CWR-FKB
ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR REQUEST OF DETERMINATION OF PRIVILEGE
Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Request for Determination of Privilege ,
and Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal . Watson requests that the Court determine
whether forty-one pages, which Defendant claims were inadvertently disclosed, are privileged.
. Plaintiff’s motion is little more than a page in length and unaccompanied by a memorandum
of legal authorities, as required by L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Consequently, the Court is without
sufficient information to rule on Plaintiff’s motion. Further, Plaintiff did not request a Fed. R. Civ.
P. 16(b)(3)(v) conference with the undersigned to address this issue prior to filing the instant
motion, as required by section 6(F)(4) of the Case Management Order. See  at 3. For these
reasons, motion  is denied without prejudice.
In motion , Plaintiff seeks leave to submit under seal the forty-one pages of documents
at issue in motion . This motion is also unaccompanied by a supporting memorandum, as
required by L.U.Civ.R. 79(e)(3). For this reason, and in light of motion  being denied without
prejudice, motion  is also denied without prejudice.
SO ORDERED, this the 11th day of January, 2018.
/s/ F. Keith Ball
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?