United States of America v. Francois

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in re 5 Report and Recommendations - IRS Summons. This court, finding that a bench warrant should issue for respondent's failure to comply, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendation as the order of this court. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 5/18/2017 (ND)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. PETITIONER CAUSE NO. 3:16-MC-00968-CWR-FKB BRENNAN L. FRANCOIS RESPONDENT ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball entered on April 3, 2017. Docket No. 5. Therein, Judge Ball recommended this Court direct respondent to appear before Rita T. Collins, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service, at 10:00 a.m. on April 24, 2017, for the purpose of full compliance with the IRS summons, served upon respondent on May 24, 2016. Judge Ball further recommended, in the event of respondent’s failure to comply, a bench warrant should issue. On May 16, 2017, the United States filed with this Court notice of respondent’s failure to comply. Docket No. 7. Therein, the government notes that respondent did not receive service of the April 3, 2017 Report and Recommendation until April 25, 2017, the day following the scheduled appearance before Revenue Officer Collins. Ms. Collins, therefore, requested respondent deliver the required financial statements to her office by May 15, 2017. Respondent failed to comply. This court, finding that a bench warrant should issue for respondent’s failure to comply, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendation as the order of this court. SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of May, 2017. s/ Carlton W. Reeves UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?