Colleton v. Shults

Filing 20

ORDER - It is ordered that the 15 Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Robert H. Walker entered on December 20, 2017, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is dismissed. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 2/13/2018 (ND)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION NATHANIEL COLLETON # 15978-171 VS. PETITIONER CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17CV278TSL-RHW LARRY SHULTS, WARDEN RESPONDENT ORDER This cause is before the court on the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker entered on December 20, 2017, recommending that Colleton’s § 2241 petition be dismissed. Petitioner Nathaniel Colleton has not filed an objection and the time for doing so has expired.1 Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the court concludes that the report and recommendation is well taken and hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Robert H. Walker entered on December 20, 2017, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is dismissed. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2018. _/s/ Tom S. Lee__________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The court’s January 9, 2018 order granted petitioner’s motion for an extension of time in which to file his objection and thereby extended the deadline for filing an objection until January 31, 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?