Henry v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
Filing
44
ORDER granting 37 Motion to Strike ; denying 22 Motion to Disqualify. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/19/18 (RBM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
KAREN HENRY
V.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-133-DPJ-FKB
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
AND JOHN DOES 1-10
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court are two motions: Wal-Mart’s Motion To Disqualify Counsel For Plaintiff
[22] and Wal-Mart’s Motion To Strike Portions Of The Affidavit Of Yancy B. Burns [37].
On October 18, 2018, the undersigned held a hearing on Wal-Mart’s Motion To Disqualify
Counsel For Plaintiff [22]. In reaching a decision, the undersigned considered all of the parties’
respective filings, except the affidavit of Yancy Burns, and arguments of counsel at the hearing.
For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Wal-Mart’s Motion To Disqualify Counsel For
Plaintiff [22] is denied.
The Court finds that Wal-Mart’s Motion To Strike Portions Of The Affidavit Of Yancy B.
Burns [37] should be granted. The subject portion of Burns’s affidavit, specifically paragraph 9,
contains inadmissible hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and should be excluded under Fed. R. Evid.
802. See [31-1] at 17. Wal-Mart’s Motion to Strike [37] is, therefore, granted. Accordingly,
paragraph 9 of Burns’s Affidavit is hereby stricken, and the undersigned did not consider any
portion of Burns’s affidavit in reaching a decision on Wal-Mart’s Motion To Disqualify Counsel
For Plaintiff [22].
SO ORDERED on the 19th day of October, 2018.
__/s/ F. Keith Ball
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?