Edwards v. Seago

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 3/29/2018 (LAT)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY EDWARDS v. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 3:18CV135-LG-LRA DR. DAVID SEAGO DEFENDANT ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS, AND DISMISSING CASE BEFORE THE COURT is the [3] Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson. Judge Anderson reviewed Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and the allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint. Judge Anderson found that Plaintiff was a pauper and should be allowed to proceed without prepayment for fees. However, the allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint did not establish either diversity or federal question jurisdiction, since they concern state law medical malpractice claims filed against a non-diverse defendant. Accordingly, Judge Anderson recommended that the [2] Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be granted, and the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised she could file objections within fourteen days of receiving the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at her address of record on March 7, 2018, and there has been no response or objection filed. Therefore, the Court need only review the Report and Recommendation and determine whether it is either clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the relevant law, the Court finds that Judge Anderson’s conclusions are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The Court will grant Plaintiff in forma pauperis status and dismiss this case without prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [3] of United States Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson entered in this cause on March 7, 2018, should be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED as the finding of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s [2] Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. A separate judgment will enter. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 29th day of March, 2018. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?