Bias v. State of Mississippi
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as well as the court filings and the relevant law, and concludes that the findings in the Report and Recommendation [1 3] should be and are hereby adopted as this Court's own. This court grants Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 9 . Accordingly, this court dismisses this Habeas Corpus Petition with prejudice. A separate Final Judgment will issue on this date. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 7/7/2020 (ND)
Case 3:19-cv-00282-HTW-FKB Document 14 Filed 07/07/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAKE BIAS, a/k/a JAKE JEROME BIAS,
#166407
vs.
PETITIONER
CIVIL ACTION No. 3:19-CV-282-HTW-FKB
LAMAR SHAW, WARDEN
RESPONDENT
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BEFORE THIS COURT is the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball, [Docket no. 13], which was entered on January 29, 2020.
Petitioner did not file any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, having
been notified of his right to do so.
After examining the record evidence in this case the Magistrate Judge recommended: that
the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [doc. no. 9] should be granted and the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus should be dismissed.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as well
as the court filings and the relevant law, and concludes that the findings in the Report and
Recommendation [doc. no. 13] should be and are hereby adopted as this Court’s own.
This
court grants Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [doc. no. 9]. Accordingly, this court dismisses this
Habeas Corpus Petition with prejudice. A separate Final Judgment will issue on this date.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 7th day of July, 2020.
s/ HENRY T. WINGATE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?