Griffin v. State of MS
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Report and Recommendations - This order, commensurately, hereby DISMISSES this lawsuit WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may re-file her Complaint, if she so chooses, with the appropriate claims. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 01/18/2023 (CO)
Case 3:22-cv-00236-HTW-LGI Document 8 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
JEWEL GRIFFIN
vs.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:22-CV-236-HTW-LGI
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DEFENDANTS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BEFORE THIS COURT is the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge [Docket no. 7] issued by Magistrate Judge Lakeysha Greer Isaac. In her Report
and Recommendation, filed on September 30, 2022, Magistrate Judge Isaac recommended that
Plaintiff Jewel Griffin’s Complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. Magistrate Judge Isaac directed the pro se plaintiff to file any
objections within fourteen (14) days. The plaintiff has failed file any objection to date.
Based upon the findings and recommendation contained in the Report and
Recommendation [Docket no. 7], this court finds it well-taken. Magistrate Judge Isaac carefully
examined plaintiff’s lawsuit, granted plaintiff sufficient time to respond to Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss, and crafted a well-versed Report and Recommendation. Therefore, this court hereby
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this court.
This order, commensurately, hereby DISMISSES this lawsuit WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff may re-file her Complaint, if she so chooses, with the appropriate claims.
SO ORDERED this the 18th day of January, 2023.
/s/HENRY T. WINGATE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?