Denham v. United States Government et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Report and Recommendations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff Cos Denhams Complaint [Docket no. 1] hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for fai lure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In light of this courts ruling, all pending motions, including the pending IFP Motions 2 and 7 , Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 3 , Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint 9 and the Petition for Redress of Grievance 10 are hereby denied and dismissed as moot. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 1/28/2025 (PG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
NORTHERN DIVISION
COS DENHAM
vs.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION No.: 3:24-CV-116-HTW-LGI
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
DEFENDANTS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BEFORE THIS COURT is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac [Docket no. 11]. In her Report and Recommendation, filed on
January 15, 2025, Magistrate Judge Isaac recommended that Plaintiff Cos Denham’s Complaint
[Doc. 1] be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a viable claim.
Magistrate Judge Isaac directed the parties to file any objections to her recommendation within
fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff filed his objections timely on January 21, 2025 [Docket no. 12].
Based upon the findings and recommendation contained in the Report and
Recommendation [Docket no. 11], this court finds it well-taken. Magistrate Judge Isaac carefully
considered the submissions of the parties, the record, and relevant law, and crafted a well-versed
Report and Recommendation. Therefore, this court overrules the Plaintiff’s objections and hereby
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff Cos Denham’s Complaint [Docket
no. 1] hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
1
In light of this court’s ruling, all pending motions, including the pending IFP Motions [2]
and [7], Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [3], Motion for Extension of Time to Amend
Complaint [9] and the Petition for Redress of Grievance [10] are hereby denied and dismissed as
moot.
SO ORDERED this the 28th day of January, 2025.
/s/HENRY T. WINGATE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?