Denham v. United States Government et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Report and Recommendations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff Cos Denhams Complaint [Docket no. 1] hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for fai lure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In light of this courts ruling, all pending motions, including the pending IFP Motions 2 and 7 , Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 3 , Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint 9 and the Petition for Redress of Grievance 10 are hereby denied and dismissed as moot. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 1/28/2025 (PG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION COS DENHAM vs. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION No.: 3:24-CV-116-HTW-LGI UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BEFORE THIS COURT is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac [Docket no. 11]. In her Report and Recommendation, filed on January 15, 2025, Magistrate Judge Isaac recommended that Plaintiff Cos Denham’s Complaint [Doc. 1] be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a viable claim. Magistrate Judge Isaac directed the parties to file any objections to her recommendation within fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff filed his objections timely on January 21, 2025 [Docket no. 12]. Based upon the findings and recommendation contained in the Report and Recommendation [Docket no. 11], this court finds it well-taken. Magistrate Judge Isaac carefully considered the submissions of the parties, the record, and relevant law, and crafted a well-versed Report and Recommendation. Therefore, this court overrules the Plaintiff’s objections and hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff Cos Denham’s Complaint [Docket no. 1] hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 1 In light of this court’s ruling, all pending motions, including the pending IFP Motions [2] and [7], Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [3], Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint [9] and the Petition for Redress of Grievance [10] are hereby denied and dismissed as moot. SO ORDERED this the 28th day of January, 2025. /s/HENRY T. WINGATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?