Richardson v. Reece
JUDGMENT that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 5/18/09 (MGB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION CHARLES RICHARDSON v. CONSTANCE REESE, Warden JUDGMENT This matter having come on to be heard on this date upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and the Court, after a full review of the record, having adopted said Report and Recommendation as the finding of this Court by Order dated this day, finds that the relief sought in Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus  is denied and that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the relief sought in the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus  by Charles Richardson in the above captioned cause is denied and the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus  be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED this the 18th day of May, 2009. PETITIONER CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:06cv181-DCB-MTP RESPONDENT
s/David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?