Issaquena and Warren Counties Land Company, LLC et al v. Warren County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al

Filing 628

ORDER denying 368 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 373 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 374 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 376 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 378 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 396 Motion to Review of Magistrate Judge Order; denying 422 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying 425 Motion to Strike ; denying 427 Motion to Strike ; denying 461 Motion in Limine; denying 476 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying 495 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 506 Motion in Limine; denying 507 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 565 Motion to Dismiss; denying 567 Motion to Dismiss; denying 579 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 582 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 616 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. All motions denied without prejudice. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 11/8/2012 (ECW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
ISSAQUENA AND WARREN COUNTIES LAND
COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.
VS.

PLAINTIFFS/
COUNTER-DEFENDANTS

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:07-cv-106(DCB)(JMR)

WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS, ET AL.

DEFENDANTS/
COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS

ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the following motions:
motions for summary judgment (docket entries 368, 373, 374, 376,
378, 495, 507, 579, and 582); motion for review of magistrate
judge’s order (docket entry 396); motion for extension of time
(docket entry 422); motions to strike (docket entries 425 and 427);
motions in limine (docket entries 461 and 506); motion for leave to
file excess pages (docket entry 476); motions to dismiss (docket
entries 565 and 567); and motion for preliminary injunction (docket
entry 616).

The parties having announced a settlement of this

action, the Court finds that the motions should be denied without
prejudice.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the aforesaid motions are DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED, this the 8th day of November, 2012.

/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE