Finnegan v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc.

Filing 45

ORDER re 40 Response/Motion filed by Daniel Finnegan to hold defendant's motion for summary judgment in abeyance: motion is granted. Plaintiff shall have 10 days from date of entry of Order to respond to motion for summary judgment. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 4-13-09 (Ward, Edwin)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION DANIEL FINNEGAN VS. AMERISTAR CASINOS, INC. ORDER This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff Daniel Finnegan's motion to hold defendant's motion for summary judgment in abeyance (docket entry 40), to which the defendant has not responded. Having carefully considered the motion, the Court finds as follows: The plaintiff's motion, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f), seeks additional time to respond to the defendant's motion for summary judgment of December 2, 2008, so that the plaintiff can propound discovery relevant to the issue of whether the defendant is the owner and/or operator of the casino where the plaintiff allegedly was injured. The Court finds that the plaintiff has had PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:07-cv-168(DCB)(JMR) DEFENDANT adequate time to propound discovery, and that his response to the defendant's motion shall be due within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to hold defendant's motion for summary judgment in abeyance (docket entry 40) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff shall have ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order to file his response to the defendant's motion. SO ORDERED, this the 13th day of April, 2009. /s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?