U. S. Technology Corporation v. Ramsay et al
Filing
186
ORDER granting 185 Transcript Request filed by MS Dept of Environmental Quality Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 8/27/2015 (ECW)
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
U.S. TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-cv-218(DCB)(JCG)
DELTA LOGGING & COMPANY, INC., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This
cause
is
before
the
Court
on
movant
Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”)’s request for a copy
of the transcripts of the evidentiary hearings held in this case on
March 26, 2015, and May 19, 2015 (docket entry 185).
In July of 2015, U.S. Technology Corporation and Raymond
Williams filed a complaint against MDEQ and two MDEQ employees
(civil action no. 5:15-cv-66).
MDEQ asserts that the civil action
against it stems from similar facts and circumstances with the
instant case, and references the instant case.
MDEQ requests
copies of the two transcripts so that it may defend the lawsuit
filed against it.
None
of
the
parties
in
the
instant
objection or response to MDEQ’s motion.
case
has
filed
any
The Court therefore
assumes that the present motion is without objection, and it shall
be granted, with the caveat that the pleadings in the instant case
are under seal, and that the transcripts of the hearings shall
remain under seal unless lifted by agreement of the parties or by
the Court.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality’s request for a copy of the transcripts of
the evidentiary hearings held in this case on March 26, 2015, and
May 19, 2015 (docket entry 185) is GRANTED, with costs of the
transcripts to be paid by movant;
FURTHER ORDERED that the transcripts shall otherwise remain
under seal.
SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of August, 2015.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?