U. S. Technology Corporation v. Ramsay et al
Filing
189
ORDER denying as moot 151 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 154 Sealed Motion; denying as moot 181 Sealed Motion Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 10/23/2015 (ECW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
U. S. TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-cv-218(DCB)(JCG)
PAT RAMSAY and
DELTA LOGGING & COMPANY, INC.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the following motions: (1)
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”)’s motion
to quash subpoenas pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(d)(3) (docket entry
151); (2) plaintiff’s motion to compel MDEQ to disclose certain
documents
and
communications
(docket
entry
154);
and
(3)
plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ proposed findings of fact
(docket entry 181).
The first two motions were resolved at the hearing of May 19,
2015. The third motion was based on the late filing of defendants’
proposed findings, which the Court in its discretion excused.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality’s motion to quash subpoenas pursuant to
Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(d)(3) (docket entry 151) is DENIED AS MOOT;
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to compel the
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality to disclose certain
documents and communications (docket entry 154) is DENIED AS MOOT;
FURTHER
ORDERED
that
the
plaintiff
U.S.
Technology
Corporation’s motion to strike defendants’ proposed findings of
fact (docket entry 181) is DENIED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED, this the 23rd day of October, 2015.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITES STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?